The Clinical Relevance of ECG Parameters in the Prediction of Cardiac Mortality: A Comprehensive Review

All published articles of this journal are available on ScienceDirect.

REVIEW ARTICLE

The Clinical Relevance of ECG Parameters in the Prediction of Cardiac Mortality: A Comprehensive Review

The Open Bioinformatics Journal 25 Jun 2024 REVIEW ARTICLE DOI: 10.2174/0118750362295563240620111209

Abstract

About half of all heart disease deaths are caused by cardiac arrest, making it one of the major causes of mortality in prosperous countries. When confronted with potentially fatal arrhythmias, implanted preventive cardioverter defibrillators significantly improve survival chances. However, this is only possible if high-risk patients who are prone to spontaneous cardiac arrest are identified beforehand. The current analysis examines the most recent findings regarding the use of surface electrocardiogram (ECG) data to predict sudden cardiac arrest. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the literature on non-invasive ECG techniques for predicting these kinds of cardiovascular crises. Several electrocardiographic risk stratification methods, including T-wave alternans, signal-averaged ECG, T-peak-to-end variation, early repolarization, an extension of the QT interval, QRS duration, QRS cluster patterns, and Holter monitoring, have been reviewed and analysed. These ECG results have shown to be useful as first screening instruments. Nonetheless, no single ECG measure has shown to be an effective technique for classifying individuals based on their risk of sudden cardiac arrest to date. Nevertheless, one or more of these prospective SEM metrics might potentially be important in intricate risk categorization schemes.

Keywords: ECG, P wave, T wave, QRS duration, T peak, QT interval.

1. INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular diseases are the leading worldwide cause of mortality. The electrocardiogram serves as an indispensable diagnostic tool and screening methodology in clinical evaluations and preliminary diagnostic investi- gations, conferring a substantial, reliable, accessible, and cost-effective approach in cardiac-related treatment. The aim of this paper has been to survey critical ECG parameters related to cardiac death and the hidden affiliated components, providing important leads for clinical practice in everyone and competitors. The primary electrocardiography parameters related to cardiac death under scrutiny majorly involve the wave-P (length, interatrial square, and profound end point pessimism of the wave-P in V1), Hiring’s of QT and Tpitch-Tend postponed, Stretching back QRS and fracture, packfilial square, ST section misery and height, waves-T (altered, wave-T tomahawks), dimensional edges among QRS and T-vectors, untimely venous compressions, and Criteria for electrocardiography fat loss.

Sudden heart demise is a significant medical issue, and the majority of the cases occur apart from the emergency clinic, except if the symptoms are previously diagnosed [1, 2]. Auxiliary and cardiac variations from the norm go about as prominent inclining components towards heart failure [3]. The electrocardiogram, the set-up account of a heartbeat, is normally utilized in diagnostic practice for clinical conclusion and forecasting, yet additional diagnostic parameters, i.e. the electrocardiography symptoms related to cardiac death and the affiliating components, provide fundamental investigation ideas for diagnostic practice in everybody and competitors [1, 4]. A few important electrocardiography factors related to cardiac death are shown in Fig. (1).

Fig. (1).

Electrocardiographic indicators of cardiac diseases.

2. WAVE-P

Wave-P reveals the atrial depolarization and conduction of the atria. Among the wave-P data from conventional electrocardiography that shed light on atrial electrical development are wave-P shape, abundance, and range. The drawn-out wave-P term, which is linked to atrial fibrillation and can cause heart illness and even stroke mortality, indicates the interatrial square, a conduction delay between the left and right atria. Interatrial square has been linked to classic cardiac risk factors such as smoking, amenorrhoea, hyper- cholesterolemia, obesity, advanced age, and sedentary lifestyle, as well as coronary artery disease, because of endothelial degradation and interatrial conduction delay caused by bloodlessness.

Similar findings were noted for patients with reduced left atrial beat volume, dynamic imperativeness, left atrial width, and electromechanical brokenness, which may account for an excess of atrial blood clots. Physical activity can raise the risk of fatal cardiac arrest and other catastrophic cardiac incidents, even if it has many benefits for physical growth [4]. Due to arterial sclerosis illness, unexpected heart death-typically the significant clinical manifestation of a cardiac problem-is dynamically unavoidable in candidates who have been prepared for longer than 35 years [4, 5]. The primary cause of unusual cardiac events in a growing number of young individuals is characteristic or acquired cardiac varieties from the standard, such as obesity, prolonged or myocardiopathy and heart attack course abnormalities, inconvenient coronary artery disease, inflammatory cardiomyopathy, Marfan's disease, valvulopathy, wolf-parkinson-white syndrome, or vehicle diacal canalopathy, and Arrhythmias might be triggered by heavy physical activities [3-8]. Not every competitor at significant risk may be identified by cardiac screening; however, in spite of quiet heart irregularities, a few indicators are unmistakable on the ECG. Certain categories are more likely to have cardiovascular problems than others, including persons, those who are more settled, Afro-Caribbean relatives, b-athletes, joggers or long-distance races, and endurance competitors [5, 9]. Regular exercise lowers the chance of myocardial restricted dysfunction and unexpected cardiac mortality; in otherwise well-prepared persons, however, strenuous exercise raises the risk of cardiac events. This phenomenon, known as “contender's heart,” or corporal cardiac adaptation to increased physical exertion, causes certain common ECG abnormalities, such as sinus bradycardia, that are not linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, first-degree atrioventricular square, early repolarization, prolonged parasympathetic nerve tone, absent right congregational branch square, and a prolonged QRS voltage due to physiologic left venous fatness are the causes of these anomalies [5, 9]. Guidelines for evaluating ECGs like those of the European Society of Cardiology [10], the “Seattle criteria” [11] and, relatively more recent the “Refined Criteria for ECG Interpretation” [12, 13]. These were specified to eliminate results that might be false positives. Periphery modifications were also depicted, in addition to the planning-related common revelations, and preparations were made for immaterial anomalous disclosures. Over a follow-up period of eighteen years, it was observed that in patients without a history of major cardiovascular diseases, delayed P frequency was related to prolonged stroke casuality, independent of common cardiovascular risk factors like treatment of diabetes and its diversity, proteinuria, heartbeat, left ventricular hypertrophy, and glycemic control. The assessment included 739 centres and developed type 2 diabetic patients with no previous record of any major cardiovascular disorder reports [14-17]. In a massive report comprising 8,143 people with a follow-up period of over 13 years reports a significant indication of P-wave in V1 (PTPV1), a marker of atrial fluctuation from the standard, was linked to an extended threat of death considering cardiovascular disease and ischemic coronary illness. It is evident that the P-wave is biphasic in V1, with the negative P prime measuring more than 1 mm, in a resting 12-lead ECG. Furthermore, in the 15,375 ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) participants, DTNPV1 was associated with an elevated risk of non-lethal events (atrial fibrillation, cardiovascular breakdown, coronary disease, and stroke) as well as an extended risk of unexpected cardiovascular fatality after 14 years of follow-up [18-22]. To sum up, delayed P-wave range, interatrial square, and marked aggressiveness of the P-wave in V1 are the most notable atrial ECG indicators of cardiopathy. Left and right atrial enlarge- ments are considered minor, unpredictable revelations and are occasional in both contenders and patients with myocardiopathy, according to the “Refined Criteria for ECG Interpretation” for elite competitors [9]. Other ECG abnormalities associated with hypertrophic cardio- myopathy, such as Q waves, T-wave inversion, and ST divide distress, are connected with left atrial development [13].

3. QT-INTERVAL

The heart's extraventricular movement potential terms are represented by the QT interval, which stretches from the T-wave to the shockingly early point of the QRS [23]. A few studies have looked at the correlation between postponed QT intervals and adverse cardiovascular events. The limitations of the QT between periods include difficulties in depicting the T-wave's completeness, varying throughout the day, fluctuations due to system and methodology, and variability within and between observers. As the Bazett condition undercorrects at lower beats and overcorrects at higher beats, and is, in a sense, appropriate for physiological heartbeats, it presents another difficult aspect of the QT interval-especially since it is typically used for a significant portion of clinical practice and research. It appears that there is an individual correlation between QT interval and HR [24]. A few factors can cause variations in the QT-interval: age, gender, medication use, autonomic changes, dyslipidemia, weight fluctuations, myocardial ischemia, diabetes, smoking, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, stroke, liver cirrhosis, frustrated renal limit, and electrolyte imbalance [25]. Precisely confirming the T-wave's completion might be difficult, particularly when the T-wave is level, atypical, or has other peculiar character- istics. Heartbeat revised QT break term (QTc) from PAREPET (Prediction of Arrhythmic Events with Positron Emission Tomography) indicated a rapid cardiac collapse in patients with defective left ventricular dispatch division and ischemic cardiomyopathy [26]. In certain patients with delayed QT intervals, torsade de pointes does not occur if the repolarization hold is typical or if the transmural dissipating of repolarization is not prolonged [27]. Cardiovascular event indicators that are progressively unstable are required. A heartbeat-updated QT interval of 470 ms or more is considered a distinctive result and a sign of readiness in top competitors. Planning separated ECG variations from the standard in candidates is observed for both long and short QT intervals [9, 13].

4. QRS-DURATION AND FRAGMENTED QRS

For patients with hypertension, those with left ventricular abnormalities, and cardiovascular mortality in all patients, the QRS length is an extrapolation of death. This finding was drawn from an analysis of 46,399 patients and a mean follow-up of six years [28, 29]. An 18% increase in cardiovascular risk was associated with every 10 ms lengthening of the QRS expression [29]. A reduction in isolated QRS is associated with intraventricular conduction delays because of the irregular start of the ventricles caused by ventricular depolarization, impaired sign transduction, myocardial ischemia and fibrosis, and scarring of the heart [30-34]. In an assessment of 355 hospitalised patients in a coronary crisis clinic, isolated QRS was found to predict severe heart events, decline, larger myocardial infarct size, and low left ventricular release parcel in individuals with serious coronary issues. how many leads have distinct QRS counts and how far apart the divided QRS is [33, 35]. In individuals with prior myocardial dead tissue, the proximity of three leads with separated QRS, at any rate, was found to be a free indication of cardiovascular destruction or hospitalisation for cardiovascular breakdown [35]. In an assessment comprising 879 patients over a follow-up of 29 months, a partitioned QRS inside viewing a huge QRS, over 120 ms, is also a symptom of myocardial scar. This is in addition to being a free predictor of mortality in patients with coronary disease. Potential explanations for unsettling outcomes in patients with separated broad QRS include cardiac or arrhythmic events, or scar-related progression of cardiovascular collapse [32]. Individualised QRS were used to predict the death rates of patients with coronary heart disease, implanted cardioverter defibrillators, ischemic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventri- cular cardiomyopathy, Brugada disease, and coronary conductor evade join the clinical system [34, 36]. Several types of divided QRS were represented in the composition: separated the two-way pack branch square, divided QRS linked with ST-segment height, RSR structure, additional R waves, and indents for the R or S wave [31, 33, 34]. Many generous or closed severe cardiac illnesses, including arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia and the Brugada issue, are associated with the rSr configuration in drives V1–V2. Moreover, it occurred to robust, asymptomatic youth and contenders as well as when drives V1 and V2 were adjusted higher. It was most usually associated with syncope or cardiovascular breakdown [37]. Similar correlations may be seen between hyperkalemia, right ventricular hypertrophy, a few cases of ventricular preexcitation, and an R configuration in drives V1 and V2 [37]. The parameters of Q, R, and S wave, in particular, the range, amplitude, and indent in ten healthy ECG leads comprised the QRS score that Strauss et al. utilised to identify and assess scars in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy [38, 39]. Additionally, they believed that patients with lower QRS scores often had fewer ventricular arrhythmias. While Brugada-like early repolarization is important in preparing irregular ECG abnormalities in contenders, scored QRS in V1 is linked to the traditional, planning-related ECG abnormalities in contenders [9]. Thus, distinct QRS patterns suggest auto-vascular death in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia, Brugada syndrome, extraordinary coronary disease, and left ventricular days work, but not in contenders.

5. GATHERING BRANCH SQUARE (GBS)

With rigorous treatment of myocardial restricted rot with early coronary revascularization and thrombolytic drugs, the rate of Q wave myocardial dead tissue decreased and the length of non-Q myocardial limited rot rose [32, 40]. Consequently, the assurance of an old myocardial dead tissue inside of seeing a pack branch square became increasingly challenging. Myocardial confined putrefaction inside an absolute left pack branch square was demonstrated by the following symptoms: Q waves in any two leads at any time (I, aVL, V5, and V6), R wave slide back from V1 to V4, and basic STT changes in any two adjacent leads at any time. The S wave late indenting was observed in all eight leads (V1–V4) [41]. Another left pack branch square could envision an extreme myocardial dead tissue with an affectability of forty-two percent and an identity of sixty-five percent in one hundred eighty-two patients with left gathering branch square (Thirteen percent with an extraordinary myocardial confined corruption) [42]. The left gathering branch square's indenting of the S wave notwithstanding the scored R wave was identified as “partitioned left pack branch ruin,” a significant indicator of mortality and limited putrefaction scarring in the heart [32]. A right-pack branch square, which has a stronger theory than a left-gathering branch square, may be able to treat a shoddy divider or myocardial scar that is organised in the right ventricle [32]. Decreased enunciation or misalignment of connections during left ventricular hypertrophy can cause uncoupling in the left ventricular working myocardium; this can be explained by a left-gathering branch square model with a low abundance of the QRS complex. Some people may react negatively to cardiovascular resynchronization treatment [43]. Whole BBBs, whether left or right, are considered sporadic disclosures and are not really related to getting ready for front-runners [13]. Naturally, a left or right extended ventricular mass may directly cause a deficiency in the right BBB and a rise in QRS voltages owing to rising discouragement estimations and divider thickness, which are linked to the candidate's heart's physiological electrocardiographic changes [9]. A full-pack branch square on the right or left is a planning-unimportant ECG variation from the typical contender. In conclusion, a right gathering branch prevents a myocardial mark in the right ventricle, whereas a left pack branch square may indicate an exceptional myocardial limited putrefaction.

6. ST-SEGMENT DEPRESSION OR ELEVATION

A number of diseases, such as severe myocardial confined rot, Brugada disease, early repolarization, and extraordinary pericarditis, have been linked to ST parcel increase. A reduction in the risk of sudden cardiac death has been associated with an increase in the height of the ST region at the point of J, in lead V3, II, and aVF, as well as at 60 ms after the J point, in both the ARIC trial and the CHS [1]. As certain molecular channels might only be active in particular cases, hence, in every single case examination of STJ and ST60 was performed. ST split stature indicates an ethnicity-related consequence that is largely inevitable in any dull person who pays little attention to sports planning [44]. In a more than ten-year follow-up study, withdrawing minor unclear ST section and T-wave anomalies (like the up-sloping ST divide misery and level or adjusted T-waves) were meaningfully linked to an elevated risk of coronary passing and basic arrhythmic casualty. These findings are customary in asymptomatic, increasingly prepared patients [45]. In older individuals, there has been a correlation found between coronary disease mortality and ambiguous ST section and T-wave abnormalities [46-48]. Although it was proposed that variations in the standard T-wave and unclear ST portion could indicate either left ventricular hypertrophy [47], or subclinical coronary disease. Since accounting for left ventricular hypertrophy or preclinical atherosclerosis did not alter the link between the STT alterations and cardiovascular events, arrhythmias may have occurred in the CHS [45]. In addition to the standard conditions pertaining to left ventricular development, electrolyte imbalances, drug or athletic limit use, cardiovascular breakdown, and dietary intake, isolated minor obscure STT anomalies are linked to physiological marvels such as uneasy weight, altered posture, hyperventilation, or central tactile framework wounds; none of these, though, could account for the association with deadly cardiovascular events [45]. Thus, at the most fundamental level, alterations in STT that are consistent and unclear-rather than those resulting from sporadic physiological phenomena-are linked to cardiovascular death [45, 49]. Regular focused exercise is linked to repolarization alterations that impact the shape of the T-wave and the ST-segment [44]. Competitive disclosures of anomalous irregularities are likely to occur in the ST divide problem and the Brugada-like model, particularly when Caucasian competitors' excessive Q waves and T-wave inversions beyond V1 are brought into play [13]. On the other hand, a prolonged vagal tone or even a loss of consciousness due to physiological ECG abnormalities in the candidate's heart may cause early repolarization, sinus bradycardia, and first- and second-degree atrioventricular blocks [9]. The STJ/ST80 extension (ST piece swells at J point/ST divide at 80 ms after the J point) may be used to differentiate early repolarization from the Brugada problem in humans [50]. In patients with Brugada issues, the ST-segment arrangement was downsloping (STJ/ST80 >1) and the ST-structure was upsloping (STJ/ST80 < 1) with good investigation accuracy for early repolarization [50]. In a nutshell, ST piece despair is an unusual observation in candidates and indicates arrhythmic and coronary damage.

7. T-WAVE

The usefulness of repolarization subintervals is not well understood. The transmural dissipating of repolari- zation or T-peak tend interim (TpTe), is a measure of ventricular arrhythmia deficiency [51, 52]. The biggest obstacle to the TpTe is the lack of a reasonable agreement regarding customary characteristics. In a thirteen-year follow-up study, abnormally aroused T-wave and delayed QTc, prolonged heartbeat, and hypertension were found to be more reliable indicators of unexpected cardiovascular death risk than coronary disease in an assessment involving eighteen thousand four hundred ninety-seven individuals who were initially free of coronary illness. T-wave inversion, QRS range, and QRS/T point were linked to the chance of sudden cardiac arrest and ranged from all causes, and past conventional cardiovascular alerting signs, according to an evaluation involving 1,949 men who were followed up for a significant period of time [53]. Severe ischemia does not cause negative T-waves; rather, they emerge in ischemia that is continuing or has disappeared. Depending on their relevance, positive or negative U waves might join the negative ischemic T waves, which even display mirror patterns [54]. T-wave inversion, QT break prolongation, and dangerous arrhythmias in patients with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy are caused by myocardial edoema rather than systolic brokenness. The Wellness ECG configuration (negative T-wave and deferred QT interval) pays little attention to the causative mechanism in these patients [55-57]. The common ECG deviation from the standard of hypertrophy and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy -the primary cause of abrupt cardiac arrest in contenders-is T-wave inversion in any of the two neighbouring leads [9, 57] Afro-Caribbean contestants logically exhibit T-wave inversion in front leads, as it distinguishes them from white contenders and refers to the ethnic diversity of their hearts, especially in relation to an angled ST division increase [44]. T-wave inversion in the sidelong leads may be an indication of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, requiring further cardiovascular assessment and monitoring. T-wave inversion, ST-segment depression, furious Q waves, and ventricle pre-excitation are thought to be the primary, planning irrelevant ECG variations from the usual in competitors.9 Disease Indices Positive T-waves in lead aVR were associated with a prolonged in-crisis centre cardiovascular death in 139 consecutive patients with impressive ST-segment elevation myocardial limited rot and uncomplicated percutaneous coronary intervention. Negative T-waves are not the sole signs of a poor prognosis [58]. As a result of the beat-to-thump change in movement potential length at the level of heart myocytes, the T-wave alternant arises, representing the heterogeneity of repolarization, acting as an arrhythmogenic-sister instrument, and causing fatal ventricular arrhythmias by immobilising the heart muscle. It also repeats the Ababa arbitrariness plan in the morphology and adequateness of the T-wave [59]. Though it is called “T-wave alternans” (TWA), the ST bit and U wave may also be included. Visual evaluation's low adequacy means that TWA may not always be seen; however, automatic filtering and forced ECG study involve its assessment. It is possible to reduce walking ECG recording-based TWA in twenty-four-hour Holter tales by taking small steps, figuring out the peak TWA value, and doing optical examinations to verify the proximity and sufficiency of TWA [60]. Similar to this, T-wave tomahawks were linked to higher fatality rates [61, 62]. The signs of cardiovascular mortality consist of T-wave tomahawks, positive T-waves in aVR, delayed TpTe intervals, and altered T-waves.

8. SPATIAL ANGLES

Strong free indicators of coronary disease and overall mortality include the spatial T centre point of the ECG and the frontal and spatial borders between the QRS and T vectors [14]. Several research found that wide QRS/T margins were linked to an increased risk of mortality [63, 64]. The spatial edge between the T-peak and average repolarization reference vector was the most reliable predictor of coronary disease mortality and sudden cardiac death in males, according to the ARIC trial. The most important variables in women with cardiovascular disease (CVD) were T beginning and T-peak vector significance extent, as well as T adequacy in aVR [65]. Among all subgroups, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (T AVR) plentifulness antagonism decreased to less than 150 V, which was the most reliable indicator of mortality [65]. The spatial limits between the mean QRS and T vectors and between the T-peak and standard R reference vectors are additional characteristics that influence ventricular repolarization. It was discovered that T in V1 was a startling reduction in cardiovascular health and a free marker of coronary disease [66]. The spatial point between the mean QRS and T vectors represents the degree of the general deviation edge between the depolarization and repolarization groups, and the spatial edge between the T-peak and common R reference vectors represents the degree of the repolarization bearing's departure from the reference course during commonplace repolarization of the left-ventricular sidelong divider. A prolonged desynchrony of repolarization in addition to a subclinical coronary sickness may be suggested by the modified direction of the repolarization game plan, which may indicate severe subepicardial myocardial ischemia. The entire spatial edge between the T-peak and traditional R reference vector [66]. Furthermore, in the Health Initiative study for females, 52,994 postmenopausal women were observed. The spatial position between T-peak and standard R reference vectors and TAVR abundance was found to be connected to coronary disease mortality [67]. The requirement for modified electronic ECG sign assessment and revamping even leads is the most significant constraint of the mentioned records [14].

9. UNFAVORABLE VENTRICULAR COMPRESSIONS (UVCS) AND ABSENTIA OF SUSTAINED VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA

Risky arrhythmias that are typically linked to heart illness are ventricular arrhythmias. The morphology of the ventricular beats that are not optimal can be useful in predicting outcomes [32]. When a Q wave above 40 ms was present, indenting the uncomfortable ventricular architecture was examined to determine whether a QR or QRS configuration could be reached, as well as myocardial dead tissue [68]. In individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who have a high risk of an untimely cardiac death, scenes of no continuous ventricular tachycardia can be seen by Holter electrocardiographic imaging [69]. Candidates without coronary disease do not have contradicting occurrences of opportune ventricular compressions [70]. Unusual physical development during contests can occasionally cause sudden death in competitors. These conditions include hidden heart molecule channelopathies, arrhythmogenic right ventri- cular cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or cardiovascular arrhythmogenic reconstructing as a result of prolonged training, all of which validate clinical concern [71-73]. Either way, the latest guidelines show that candidates with atrial or ventricular arrhythmias and two PVCs per 10 seconds are deemed to be getting ready for minimal masochist ECG abnormalities [13]. In a study involving 5,112 participants and a seven-year follow-up, exercise-induced tachyarrhythmia in exceptionally well-prepared candidates without a significant coronary disease-including less-than-ideal ventricular throbs-was good and unrelated to fatal events or the improvement of coronary illness [73].

10. ECG VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY

A number of ECG criteria, such as the Cornell item, the Romhilt-Estes scoring system, and the Mazzaro score, as well as traditional voltage criteria, including the Sokolow-Lyon criteria, which are the sum of the S wave in V1 and the R wave in V5 or V6 ≥35 mm, were developed for left ventricular hypertrophy [74-77]. ECG left ventricular hypertrophy criteria are significant risk markers for the evaluation of disease transmission and the prognosis of cardiovascular illnesses, especially sudden cardiac death, despite their limited affectability. In patients with hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy is a clear sign of myocardial confined putrefaction, congestive cardiovascular breakdown, and abrupt cardiovascular death. It also suggests harm to the target organ [78-80]. Both Cornell and Sokolow-Lyon's criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy were revealed to be risk factors for stroke, even in those with normal blood pressure, in sizable research of the Japanese population [81]. Over a 4.3-year follow-up period, heart rate, Q waves, and the Cornell voltage-range item were found to be positively associated with the cardiovascular decline in 1,473 patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis [82]. Sokolow-Lyon voltage criteria, Cornell thing criteria, LIFE trial (Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension), or ECG strain improved hypothesis of cardiovascular events for ECG LVH all indicated that a better outcome, free from beat deterioration, was linked to backsliding of ECG LVH following antihypertensive medication [83]. Electrocardiographic features such as QRS prolongation (false negative LVH-ECG status), modest STT irregularities, or severe electrocardiographic abnormalities are linked to errors in the ECG and heart-appealing reverberation imaging heart failure outcomes [84]. The classical perspective on left ventricular hypertrophy in the ECG demonstrates that QRS voltages are prolonged by physiological left ventricular hypertrophy brought on by prolonged physical activity. Whether an isometric or isotonic movement occurs determines the divider thickness [85]. Twelve female competitors showed a decrease in QRS size following twenty-one months of intense aerobatic training, in addition to an increase in height and weight of the female participants. This result was consistent with the idea of voltage shortage throughout the initial stages of left ventricular hypertrophy [86]. Current ECG regulations for contenders see restricted R and S wave amplitudes surpassing established requirements for LVH as a physiological response to preparation (physiologic LVH), rather than as a predictor of cardiovascular death [9, 13]. The division of physiologic left ventricular hypertrophy (resulting from maintained physical planning) from pathologic LVH (resulting from hypertrophic cardio- myopathy, associated with sudden cardiovascular mortality) is the guideline concern in tip-top candidates [87]. Studies have shown that the revised standards for evaluating candidates' ECGs increased the precision of identifying hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in both Arabic and dull candidates. Later research has shown that an extraordinary amount of practice breaks the right ventricle rather than the left, with a noticeable full flashing recovery; nonetheless, in certain candidates, the right ventricle had obvious functional and structural alterations [72]. The significant decrease in right ventricular limit increased with race length and was linked to troponin I and B-type natriuretic peptide, two biomarkers of myocardial damage. In a post-race and weeks later, an examination of forty competitors who were taught at design revealed no movements of the left ventricular limit. Given that candidates seeking an increasingly expanded length showed progressively critical reductions in the right ventricular limit, it was proposed that the heart's ability to sustain an extended cardiovascular yield is limited. The planning level also affects myocardial damage and the decrease in the right ventricular limit [72]. For endurance athletes, stroke volume can be increased to over 75% of maximal oxygen uptake; this can be done voluntarily for extended diastolic filling and ventricular cleaning, as well as for momentarily increasing cardiac yield [88]. Deferred, irrational volume over-trouble may cause the right ventricle to become overwhelmed, leading to right ventricular brokenness and broadening of the atrium and ventricles. When severe fatigue is combined with excessive dilatation of the passing chamber, primitive cardiac fibrosis can develop. This can be a precursor to ventricular tachyarrhythmia and no ischemia rapid arrhythmic fate [6, 88]. Phidippides cardiomyopathy is the term for a sustained increase in cardiovascular yield that causes transient chamber enlargement and concomitant heart fibrosis in tilted individuals. Ultimately, it is cardiac arrhythmogenic overhauling due to delayed intense activity. Only male participants met the voltage requirements for right ventricular hypertrophy because their hearts changed more significantly than those of female competitors. These parameters showed no correlation with cardiovascular pathology in asymptomatic candidates [9]. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, which has a less dramatic appearance and a lower risk of arrhythmia, may be detected in people with normal electrocardiograms or narrow QRS voltage criterion for left ventricular hypertrophy [89]. ECG LVH is a marker for myocardial dead tissue, congestive cardiovascular breakdown, stroke, and unexpected cardiovascular death. It can also indicate a relapse in LVH as a result of improved treatment outcomes. Prolonged physical activity, as opposed to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, results in natural left ventricular enlargement and decreases right ventricular function. Isolate QRS voltage criteria for left or right ventricular hypertrophy. Planning-related ECG abnormalities from the norm in candidates are typical [9].

11. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ECG VARIABLES DATA AND ITS INTERPRETATION

To improve the accuracy of interpreting electrocardiograms (ECGs), streamline healthcare decision-making, and reduce costs, computerized ECG interpretation has been developed. Globally, millions of ECGs are recorded each year, with the majority automatically analyzed and interpreted right away. Despite ongoing improvements in ECG algorithms, there are still limitations in the accuracy of computerized interpretation. Unfortunately, doctors who aren't trained in interpreting ECGs may overlook interpretation errors and simply trust the automated diagnosis. This could result in improper patient management, risking unnecessary treatments or investigations. Consequently, experts consistently stress the importance of thoroughly reviewing and validating computerized interpretations by skilled ECG readers. It is equally critical to effectively incorporate new ECG information into clinical practice [90].

11.1. Electrocardiogram Variable Varieties and their Specifications

11.1.1. Time-domain Specifications

11.1.1.1. Benefits

Simple computation and clear interpretation.

11.1.1.2. Drawbacks

Include limited sensitivity to specific arrhythmias and poorer information in complicated instances.

11.2. Parameters in the Frequency Domain

11.2.1. Benefits

May shed light on the frequency components of ECG readings.

11.2.2. Drawbacks

May require sophisticated signal processing methods; interpretation may be difficult.

11.3. Parameters Dependent on Amplitude

11.3.1. Benefits

Helpful in identifying anomalies in amplitude.

11.3.2. Drawbacks

May miss slight changes and susceptible to noise interference.

11.4. Parameters of Heart Rate Variability (HRV)

11.4.1. Benefits

Reflects activity of the autonomic nervous system, which is helpful in monitoring cardiac health.

11.4.2. Drawbacks

Numerous factors, including age, medication, and degree of activity, influence interpretation.

Key technical considerations for digital ECG programs providing diagnostic interpretation include the following aspects of signal processing: acquisition, translation of analog to digital signals, and noise reduction filtering (e.g., myopotentials, movement artifacts, baseline wandering associated with breathing). Effective filtering of ECG data holds considerable influence over the ultimate processed signal, underscoring its indispensability in the process. Most automated systems now capture all ECG leads simultaneously. They generate an average complex for each lead by creating representative template complexes (dominant complexes) without premature beats. This process involves identifying waveforms accurately, including the P-wave, QRS complex, and T-wave onset and offset. Aligning and overlaying the representative complex for each lead allows for more precise labeling of waveform onset and offset. Measure- ments of amplitude parameters and intervals (PR, QRS, and QT) are conducted, with global interval measures typically yielding higher values than single lead measurements due to the elimination of isoelectric intervals found in individual leads. While this process is straightforward in normal sinus rhythm, it becomes more complex in the presence of atrial arrhythmias, often requiring time-domain or spectral analysis to recognize and differentiate rapid electrical atrial activity. Variations in manufacturers' algorithms for identifying wave start and end points also result in periodic variations in QRS duration and variations in QT interval interfering with precise analysis [91, 92].

11.5. Measures to Improve Sensitivity of ECG Data Analysis

1. Examining how various ECG parameter types function in particular clinical settings as ischemia, arrhythmia diagnosis, etc.

2. Analyzing in detail the advantages and disadvantages of each sort of parameter, including sensitivity, specificity, interpretability, etc.

3. Drawing attention to any new developments or patterns generated in ECG parameter analysis.

CONCLUSION

Globally, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) constitute the primary cause of mortality. For CVDs, the electro- cardiogram (ECG) is a commonly utilised diagnostic instrument. CVDs are linked to several ECG character- istics, including wave-P, QT interval, QRS duration, bundle branch block (BBB), T-wave, and spatial angles. Atrial depolarization and conduction are indicated by Wave-P. Atrial fibrillation is associated with delayed P-wave length, which can lead to heart disease and potentially stroke death. Heart illness can result from the interatrial block, a conduction delay that occurs between the left and right atria and is also associated with atrial fibrillation. The extraventricular movement potential terms of the heart are represented by the QT interval. Because of ventricular depolarization, poor signal transduction, myocardial ischemia and fibrosis, and heart scarring, the ventricles start irregularly, which is why shortened QT intervals are associated with intraventricular conduction delays. The length of the QRS indicates how long it takes for the ventricles to depolarize completely. Due to irregular ventricle start induced by ventricular depolarization, poor signal transduction, myocardial ischemia and fibrosis, and heart scarring, prolonged QRS duration is linked to intraventricular conduction delays. BBB is a disorder where the heart's electrical signals do not pass through the conduction system of the heart correctly. An elevated risk of cardiovascular mortality is linked to BBB. The electrical activity of the heart changes when there is an elevation or depression in the ST-segment. Myocardial infarction is linked to ST-segment depression. Early repolarization, pericarditis, and Brugada syndrome are linked to ST-segment elevation. Contraction of the ventricles is represented by the T-wave. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are linked to T-wave inversion. Higher death rates have also been connected to T-wave tomahawks. Another crucial ECG parameter is spatial angles. Strong free indications of coronary disease and overall mortality include the frontal and spatial borders between the QRS and T vectors, as well as the spatial T centre point of the ECG. To sum up, the ECG is a useful diagnostic tool for cardiovascular diseases. CVDs are linked to several ECG characteristics, including wave-P, QT interval, QRS duration, BBB, ST-segment depression or elevation, T-wave, and spatial angles. Healthcare practitioners can more accurately detect and treat CVDs by being aware of certain ECG characteristics.

Patients who are at high risk of unfavourable outcomes can be identified non-invasively thanks to basic ECG signs. Assessing risk in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients is crucial for identifying who can benefit from more targeted management of cardiovascular risk factors and preventative interventions. Heart failure is associated with a number of factors, such as irregular heart rhythms, extended QT and T-peak-Tend intervals, spatial correlations between QRS and T vectors, ventricular arrhythmias, ECG hypertrophy criteria, and P-wave features (like interatrial block, length, and significant terminal positivity of the P-wave in V1). Even still, more research is required on the majority of these ECG variables.

AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTIONS

It is hereby acknowledged that all authors have accepted responsibility for the manuscript's content and consented to its submission. They have meticulously reviewed all results and unanimously approved the final version of the manuscript.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

ECG = Electrocardiogram
QTc = QT break term
PAREPET = Prediction of Arrhythmic Events with Positron Emission Tomography
GBS = Gathering Branch Square
CVD = Cardiovascular Disease

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

FUNDING

None.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Dr. Salman Akhtar is the associate editorial board member of the journal The Open Bioinformatics Journal.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

REFERENCES

1
Soliman EZ, Prineas RJ, Case LD, et al. Electrocardiographic and clinical predictors separating atherosclerotic sudden cardiac death from incident coronary heart disease. Heart 2011; 97(19): 1597-601.
2
Nichol G, Aufderheide TP, Eigel B, et al. Regional systems of care for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A policy statement from the american heart association. Circulation 2010; 121(5): 709-29.
3
Thiene G, Corrado D, Rigato I, Basso C. Why and how to support screening strategies to prevent sudden death in athletes. Cell Tissue Res 2012; 348(2): 315-8.
4
Schmied C, Borjesson M. Sudden cardiac death in athletes. J Intern Med 2014; 275(2): 93-103.
5
Corrado D, Schmied C, Basso C, et al. Risk of sports: Do we need a pre-participation screening for competitive and leisure athletes? Eur Heart J 2011; 32(8): 934-44.
6
Trivax JE, McCullough PA. Phidippides cardiomyopathy: A review and case illustration. Clin Cardiol 2012; 35(2): 69-73.
7
Mangold S, Kramer U, Franzen E, et al. Detection of cardiovascular disease in elite athletes using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Röfo Fortschr Geb Röntgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2013; 185(12): 1167-74.
8
Zorzi A, ElMaghawry M, Corrado D. Evolving interpretation of the athlete’s electrocardiogram: From European Society of Cardiology and Stanford criteria, to Seattle criteria and beyond. J Electrocardiol 2015; 48(3): 283-91.
9
Corrado D, Calore C, Zorzi A, Migliore F. Improving the interpretation of the athlete’s electrocardiogram. Eur Heart J 2013; 34(47): 3606-9.
10
Corrado D, Pelliccia A, Heidbuchel H, et al. Recommendations for interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiogram in the athlete. Eur Heart J 2010; 31(2): 243-59.
11
Drezner JA, Ackerman MJ, Anderson J, et al. Electrocardiographic interpretation in athletes: The ‘Seattle Criteria’. Br J Sports Med 2013; 47(3): 122-4.
12
Sheikh N, Papadakis M, Ghani S, et al. Comparison of electrocardiographic criteria for the detection of cardiac abnormalities in elite black and white athletes. Circulation 2014; 129(16): 1637-49.
13
Riding NR, Sheikh N, Adamuz C, et al. Comparison of three current sets of electrocardiographic interpretation criteria for use in screening athletes. Heart 2015; 101(5): 384-90.
14
Prineas R J, Crow R S, Zhang Z M. The MinnesotaCode Manual of Electrocardiographic Findings: Including Measurement and Comparison with the Novacode; Standards and Procedures for ECG Measurement in Epidemiologic and Clinical Trials Springer Science+Business Media2009.
15
Magnani JW, Gorodeski EZ, Johnson VM, et al. P wave duration is associated with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality outcomes: The national health and nutrition examination survey. Heart Rhythm 2011; 8(1): 93-100.
16
Bayés de Luna A, Platonov P, Cosio FG, et al. Interatrial blocks. A separate entity from left atrial enlargement: A consensus report. J Electrocardiol 2012; 45(5): 445-51.
17
Vepsäläinen T, Laakso M, Lehto S, Juutilainen A, Airaksinen J, Rönnemaa T. Prolonged P wave duration predicts stroke mortality among type 2 diabetic patients with prevalent non-major macrovascular disease. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2014; 14(1): 168-74.
18
Ariyarajah V, Kranis M, Apiyasawat S, Spodick DH. Potential factors that affect electrocardiographic progression of interatrial block. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2007; 12(1): 21-6.
19
Ariyarajah V, Mercado K, Apiyasawat S, Puri P, Spodick DH. Correlation of left atrial size with p-wave duration in interatrial block. Chest 2005; 128(4): 2615-8.
20
Goyal SB, Spodick DH. Electromechanical dysfunction of the left atrium associated with interatrial block. Am Heart J 2001; 142(5): 823-7.
21
Tereshchenko LG, Shah AJ, Li Y, Soliman EZ. Electrocardiographic deep terminal negativity of the P wave in V1 and risk of mortality: The national health and nutrition examination survey III. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2014; 25(11): 1242-8.
22
Tereshchenko LG, Henrikson CA, Sotoodehnia N, et al. Electrocardiographic deep terminal negativity of the P wave in V(1) and risk of sudden cardiac death: The atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. J Am Heart Assoc 2014; 3(6): e001387.
23
Goldberger JJ, Cain ME. AHA/ACC Foundation/Heart Rhythm Society scientific statement on noninvasive risk stratification techniques for identifying patients at risk for Sudden cardiac death: A scientific statement from the AHA Council on Clinical Cardiology Committee on Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 1179-99.
24
Batchvarov V, Malik M. Individual patterns of QT/RR relationship. Card Electrophysiol Rev 2002; 6(3): 282-8.
25
Mozos I, Serban C, Mihaescu R. The relation between arterial blood pressure variables and ventricular repolarization parameters. Int J Collab Res Intern Med Public Health 2012; 4(6): 860-75.
26
Al-Zaiti SS, Fallavollita JA, Canty JM Jr, Carey MG. Electrocardiographic predictors of sudden and non-sudden cardiac death in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Heart Lung 2014; 43(6): 527-33.
27
Muntean D, Varro A, Jost N. Translational Research inCardiovascular Disease A Cross-Border Approach 2009.
28
Liew R. Electrocardiogram-based predictors of sudden cardiac death in patients with coronary artery disease. Clin Cardiol 2011; 34(8): 466-73.
29
Desai AD, Yaw TS, Yamazaki T, Kaykha A, Chun S, Froelicher VF. Prognostic significance of quantitative QRS duration. Am J Med 2006; 119(7): 600-6.
30
Shadaksharappa KS, Kalbfleisch JM, Conrad LL, Sarkar NK. Recognition and significance of intraventricular block due to myocardial infarction (peri-infarction block). Circulation 1968; 37(1): 20-6.
31
Das MK, Saha C, El Masry H, et al. Fragmented QRS on a 12-lead ECG: A predictor of mortality and cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. Heart Rhythm 2007; 4(11): 1385-92.
32
Das MK, Suradi H, Maskoun W, et al. Fragmented wide QRS on a 12-lead ECG. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2008; 1(4): 258-68.
33
Erdinler İ, Karaçimen D, Ozcan KS, et al. The relationship between fragmentation on electrocardiography and in-hospital prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Med Sci Monit 2014; 20: 913-9.
34
Jain R, Singh R, Yamini S, Das M. Fragmented ECG as a risk marker in cardiovascular diseases. Curr Cardiol Rev 2014; 10(3): 277-86.
35
Torigoe K, Tamura A, Kawano Y, Shinozaki K, Kotoku M, Kadota J. The number of leads with fragmented QRS is independently associated with cardiac death or hospitalization for heart failure in patients with prior myocardial infarction. J Cardiol 2012; 59(1): 36-41.
36
Çiçek Y, Kocaman S A, Durakoglugil M E. Relationship of fragmented QRS with prognostic markers and long-term major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery J Cardiovasc Med 2015; 16(2): 112-7.
37
Baranchuk A, Enriquez A, García-Niebla J, Bayés-Genís A, Villuendas R, Bayés de Luna A. Differential diagnosis of rSr’ pattern in leads V1 -V2. Comprehensive review and proposed algorithm. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2015; 20(1): 7-17.
38
Strauss DG, Selvester RH, Lima JAC, et al. ECG quantification of myocardial scar in cardiomyopathy patients with or without conduction defects: Correlation with cardiac magnetic resonance and arrhythmogenesis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2008; 1(5): 327-36.
39
Strauss DG, Poole JE, Wagner GS, et al. An ECG index of myocardial scar enhances prediction of defibrillator shocks: An analysis of the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial. Heart Rhythm 2011; 8(1): 38-45.
40
Furman MI, Dauerman HL, Goldberg RJ, Yarzbeski J, Lessard D, Gore JM. Twenty-two year (1975 to 1997) trends in the incidence, in-hospital and long-term case fatality rates from initial q-wave and non-q-wave myocardial infarction: A multi-hospital, community-wide perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37(6): 1571-80.
41
Hands ME, Cook EF, Stone PH, et al. Electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction in the presence of complete left bundle branch block. Am Heart J 1988; 116(1): 23-31.
42
Kontos MC, McQueen RH, Jesse RL, Tatum JL, Ornato JP. Can myocardial infarction be rapidly identified in emergency department patients who have left bundle-branch block? Ann Emerg Med 2001; 37(5): 431-8.
43
Potse M, Krause D, Bacharova L, Krause R, Prinzen FW, Auricchio A. Similarities and differences between electrocardiogram signs of left bundle-branch block and left-ventricular uncoupling. Europace 2012; 14(5)(Suppl. 5): v33-9.
44
Papadakis M, Carre F, Kervio G, et al. The prevalence, distribution, and clinical outcomes of electrocardiographic repolarization patterns in male athletes of African/Afro-Caribbean origin. Eur Heart J 2011; 32(18): 2304-13.
45
Kumar A, Prineas RJ, Arnold AM, et al. Prevalence, prognosis, and implications of isolated minor nonspecific ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities in older adults: Cardiovascular Health Study. Circulation 2008; 118(25): 2790-6.
46
Greenland P, Xie X, Liu K, et al. Impact of minor electrocardiographic ST-segment and/or T-wave abnormalities on cardiovascular mortality during long-term follow-up. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91(9): 1068-74.
47
Kannel WB, Anderson K, McGee DL, Degatano LS, Stampfer MJ. Nonspecific electrocardiographic abnormality as a predictor of coronary heart disease: The Framingham Study. Am Heart J 1987; 113(2): 370-6.
48
Kumar A, Lloyd-Jones DM. Clinical significance of minor nonspecific ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities in asymptomatic subjects: A systematic review. Cardiol Rev 2007; 15(3): 133-42.
49
Daviglus ML, Liao Y, Greenland P, et al. “Association of non-specific minor ST-T abnormalities with cardiovascular mortal-ity,” T he. JAMA 1999; 281(6): 530-6.
50
Zorzi A, Leoni L, Di Paolo FM, et al. Differential diagnosis between early repolarization of athlete’s heart and coved-type Brugada electrocardiogram. Am J Cardiol 2015; 115(4): 529-32.
51
Kanters JK, Haarmark C, Vedel-Larsen E, et al. TpeakTend interval in long QT syndrome. J Electrocardiol 2008; 41(6): 603-8.
52
Gussack I, Antzelevitch C. Electrical Diseases of theHeart Genetics, Mechanisms, Treatment, Prevention 2008.
53
Laukkanen JA, Di Angelantonio E, Khan H, Kurl S, Ronkainen K, Rautaharju P. T-wave inversion, QRS duration, and QRS/T angle as electrocardiographic predictors of the risk for sudden cardiac death. Am J Cardiol 2014; 113(7): 1178-83.
54
de Luna AB, Zareba W, Fiol M, et al. Negative T wave in ischemic heart disease: A consensus article. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2014; 19(5): 426-41.
55
Migliore F, Zorzi A, Marra MP, et al. Myocardial edema underlies dynamic T-wave inversion (Wellens’ ECG pattern) in patients with reversible left ventricular dysfunction. Heart Rhythm 2011; 8(10): 1629-34.
56
Migliore F, Zorzi A, Perazzolo Marra M, Iliceto S, Corrado D. Myocardial edema as a substrate of electrocardiographic abnormalities and life-threatening arrhythmias in reversible ventricular dysfunction of takotsubo cardiomyopathy: Imaging evidence, presumed mechanisms, and implications for therapy. Heart Rhythm 2015; 12(8): 1867-77.
57
Migliore F, Zorzi A, Michieli P, et al. Prevalence of cardiomyopathy in Italian asymptomatic children with electrocardiographic T-wave inversion at preparticipation screening. Circulation 2012; 125(3): 529-38.
58
Ayhan E, Isık T, Uyarel H, et al. Prognostic significance of T-wave amplitude in lead aVR on the admission electrocardiography in patients with anterior wall ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous intervention. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2013; 18(1): 51-7.
59
Verrier RL, Klingenheben T, Malik M. Microvolt T-wave alternans: physiological basis, methods of measurement, and clinical utility-consensus guideline by International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58(13): 1309-24.
60
Quan XQ, Zhou HL, Ruan L, et al. Ability of ambulatory ECG-based T-wave alternans to modify risk assessment of cardiac events: A systematic review. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2014; 14(1): 198.
61
Kors JA, de Bruyne MC, Hoes AW, et al. T axis as an indicator of risk of cardiac events in elderly people. Lancet 1998; 352(9128): 601-5.
62
Rautaharju PM, Nelson JC, Kronmal RA, et al. Usefulness of T-axis deviation as an independent risk indicator for incident cardiac events in older men and women free from coronary heart disease (the Cardiovascular Health Study)∗∗See Appendix for list of participating institutions and principal staff. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88(2): 118-23.
63
Zhang Z, Prineas RJ, Case D, Soliman EZ, Rautaharju PM. Comparison of the prognostic significance of the electrocardiographic QRS/T angles in predicting incident coronary heart disease and total mortality (from the atherosclerosis risk in communities study). Am J Cardiol 2007; 100(5): 844-9.
64
Whang W, Shimbo D, Levitan EB, et al. Relations between QRS|T angle, cardiac risk factors, and mortality in the third national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Am J Cardiol 2012; 109(7): 981-7.
65
Rautaharju PM, Zhang ZM, Haisty WK Jr, Kucharska-Newton AM, Rosamond WD, Soliman EZ. Electrocardiographic repolarization-related predictors of coronary heart disease and sudden cardiac deaths in men and women with cardiovascular disease in the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. J Electrocardiol 2015; 48(1): 101-11.
66
Rautaharju PM, Zhang Z-M, Warren J. Electrocardiographic predictors of coronary heart disease and sudden cardiac deaths in men and women free from cardiovascular disease in the Atherosclerosis Risk in communities study. J Am Heart Assoc 2013; 2(3)e000061
67
Rautaharju PM, Zhang ZM, Vitolins M, et al. Electrocardiographic repolarization-related variables as predictors of coronary heart disease death in the women’s health initiative study. J Am Heart Assoc 2014; 3(4): e001005.
68
Dash H, Ciotola TJ. Morphology of ventricular premature beats as an aid in the electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1983; 52(5): 458-61.
69
Gersh BJ, Maron BJ, Bonow RO, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142(6): e153-203.
70
Biffi A, Pelliccia A, Verdile L, et al. Long-term clinical significance of frequent and complex ventricular tachyarrhythmias in trained athletes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40(3): 446-52.
71
Corrado D, Basso C, Rizzoli G, Schiavon M, Thiene G. Does sports activity enhance the risk of sudden death in adolescents and young adults? J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42(11): 1959-63.
72
La Gerche A, Burns AT, Mooney DJ, et al. Exercise-induced right ventricular dysfunction and structural remodelling in endurance athletes. Eur Heart J 2012; 33(8): 998-1006.
73
Verdile L, Maron BJ, Pelliccia A, Spataro A, Santini M, Biffi A. Clinical significance of exercise-induced ventricular tachyarrhythmias in trained athletes without cardiovascular abnormalities. Heart Rhythm 2015; 12(1): 78-85.
74
Sokolow M, Lyon TP. The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertrophy as obtained by unipolar precordial and limb leads. Am Heart J 1949; 37(2): 161-86.
75
Molloy TJ, Okin PM, Devereux RB, Kligfield P. Electrocardiographic detection of left ventricular hypertrophy by the simple QRS voltage-duration product. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20(5): 1180-6.
76
Romhilt DW, Estes EH Jr. A point-score system for the ECG diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. Am Heart J 1968; 75(6): 752-8.
77
Mazzaro CdoL, Costa FdeA, Bombig MTN, et al. Ventricular mass and electrocardiographic criteria of hypertrophy: evaluation of new score. Arq Bras Cardiol 2008; 90(4): 227-31.
78
Desai CS, Ning H, Lloyd-Jones DM. Competing cardiovascular outcomes associated with electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy: The atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Heart 2012; 98(4): 330-4.
79
Kannel WB, Gordon T, Castelli WP, Margolis JR. Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy and risk of coronary heart disease. The Framingham study. Ann Intern Med 1970; 72(6): 813-22.
80
Kannel WB, Dannenberg AL, Levy D. Population implications of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 1987; 60(17): 85-93.
81
Ishikawa J, Ishikawa S, Kabutoya T, et al. Cornell product left ventricular hypertrophy in electrocardiogram and the risk of stroke in a general population. Hypertension 2009; 53(1): 28-34.
82
Greve AM, Dalsgaard M, Bang CN, et al. Usefulness of the electrocardiogram in predicting cardiovascular mortality in asymptomatic adults with aortic stenosis (from the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis Study). Am J Cardiol 2014; 114(5): 751-6.
83
Bang CN, Devereux RB, Okin PM. Regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy or strain is associated with lower incidence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients independent of blood pressure reduction – A LIFE review. J Electrocardiol 2014; 47(5): 630-5.
84
Bacharova L, Chen H, Estes EH, et al. Determinants of discrepancies in detection and comparison of the prognostic significance of left ventricular hypertrophy by electrocardiogram and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 2015; 115(4): 515-22.
85
Spirito P, Pelliccia A, Proschan MA, et al. Morphology of the “athlete’s heart” assessed by echocardiography in 947 elite athletes representing 27 sports. Am J Cardiol 1994; 74(8): 802-6.
86
Bacharova L, Tibenska M, Kucerova D, Kyselovicova O, Medekova H, Kyselovic J. Decrease in QRS amplitude in juvenile female competitive athletes during the initial twenty-one months of intensive training. Cardiol J 2007; 14(3): 260-5.
87
Pelliccia A, Maron MS, Maron BJ. Assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy in a trained athlete: Differential diagnosis of physiologic athlete’s heart from pathologic hypertrophy. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2012; 54(5): 387-96.
88
Trivax JE, Franklin BA, Goldstein JA, et al. Acute cardiac effects of marathon running. J Appl Physiol 2010; 108(5): 1148-53.
89
Calore C, Melacini P, Pelliccia A, et al. Prevalence and clinical meaning of isolated increase of QRS voltages in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy versus athlete’s heart: Relevance to athletic screening. Int J Cardiol 2013; 168(4): 4494-7.
90
Okninska M, Paterek A, Bierla J, Czarnowska E, Maczewski M, Mackiewicz U. Effect of age and sex on the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia in a rat model of acute ischemia. Biomed Pharmacother 2021; 142: 111983.
91
Kauferstein S, Kiehne N, Neumann T, Pitschner H, Bratzke H. Cardiac gene defects can cause sudden cardiac death in young people. Deutsches Arzteblatt International 2009; 106(4): 41-ii.
92
Singh S M. Population trends in all-cause mortality and cause-specific death with incident atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc 2020; 9(19): e016810.