Bioinformatic Analysis of a “Functional Cluster” Probably Related to Retinitis Pigmentosa

Luigi Donato1, 2, 3, *, Lucia Denaro1
1 Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Images, Division of Medical Biotechnologies and Preventive Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
2 Department of vanguard medicine and therapies, biomolecular strategies and neuroscience, Section of Neuroscience-Applied Molecular Genetics and Predictive Medicine, I. E. ME. S. T., Palermo, Italy
3 Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy

Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 1059
Abstract HTML Views: 603
PDF Downloads: 346
ePub Downloads: 380
Total Views/Downloads: 2388
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 457
Abstract HTML Views: 270
PDF Downloads: 198
ePub Downloads: 123
Total Views/Downloads: 1048

© 2018 Donato and Denaro.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: ( This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Images, Division of Medical Biotechnologies and Preventive Medicine, University of Messina, via C. Valeria 1, 98125 Messina, Italy; Tel: +39 0902213324; Fax: +39 090692449; E-mail:



Retinitis pigmentosa is an eye hereditary disease caused by photoreceptor death. One of the biggest problem is represented by its genetic heterogeneity, which has not yet allowed us to found all causative genes and how known ones could influence each other, leading to retinitis etiopathogenesis.


To propose the possible relation between the “functional cluster” of vision dark adaptation, made of five phototransductional genes (RCVRN, GNB1, GNGT1, GRK7 and ARRB1), and retinitis pigmentosa onset.


A bioinformatic approach was exploited: the starting point was searching through online database as PubMed and EMBASE to acquire information about the state of art of these gene. This step was followed by an in-silico analysis, performed by softwares as Cytoscape and Genecards Suite Plus, articulated in three phases: I) identification of common pathways and genes involved in; II) collection of previously detected genes; III) deep analysis of intersected genes and implication into etiopathogenesis of analzyed disease.


The whole in-silico analysis showed that all five gene products cooperate during phototransductional activation, expecially in the dark adaptation. Interestingly, the most exciting aspect regards the direct relation with several known retinitis pigmentosa causative genes, in form of protein interactions or other pathway correlations.


Pathway analysis permitted us to hypothesize a possible role of analyzed genes in retinitis pigmentosa etiopathogenesis, also considering the key activity of their encoded proteins. Next step will be validating our hypotesis with functional assays to ensure the real meaning of this possible association, leading to new potential retinitis pigmentosa causative genes.

Keywords: Retinitis pigmentosa, Maculopathy, Reactome, Biograph, String, Genecards.


Retinitis pigmentosa is a genetic disease involving the retina, the back portion of the eye, photosensitive and appointed to focus light signals towards the optical nerve first, then towards brain, after their transduction into the electrical stimuli [1]. It is an uncommon condition affecting about 1 in 4,000 people in the United States, and 1-5/10.000 in Italy [2], with an incidence just slightly lower than other rare genetic pathologies like Cerebral Cavernous Malformations (CCMs) [3, 4].

1.1. Biological Features of Retinitis Pigmentosa

The term “pigmentosa” deals with the characteristic appearance, during the advanced states of the disease, of abnormal areas of pigment into the retina. Degeneration involves both eyes and affects photoreceptors and Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE) [5], inducing a slow and progressive death in these cells and leading to lose ability to transmit brain the visual informations. Photoreceptors are particular light-sensitive cells: cones, so called for their characteristic shape, incorporate image and color details, and are mainly localized in the retina central part, called macula; rods, elongated and tapered, are involved in night vision and low light conditions, as well as in object motion perception, and are predominantly distributed in the peripheral zone [6]. Thanks to these receptors, for example, we can realize the danger that comes close to the corner of the eye, even if we are not able to perceive the details. Rods represent retinitis first and most involved photoreceptor system (cones are involved in advanced stages of disease, even if with a currently unknown mechanism): they undergo apoptosis, with a loss rate evidenced by ONL (Outer Nuclear layer, the retinal layer which contains them) decrease and retinal accumulation of pigment (rhodopsin) [7]. Generally, it can be assumed that the mere presence of the rods provides survival signals needed to keep “alive” cones.

1.2. Clinical Features of Retinitis Pigmentosa

About the clinical picture, the first symptom is (but not always) the decrease of crepuscular nocturnal visual acuity (difficulty in driving at night or move in dimly illuminated rooms), until you come to a narrowing of the peripheral visual field (difficulty in perceiving objects placed laterally or seeing the steps going down the stairs) and, in the final stage of the disease, the loss of central vision and blindness [8]. It can also be accompanied by cataract or deafness, events directly related to retinitis pigmentosa. Diagnosis [9] consists of fundus examination and visual field, followed by visus, electroretinogram and fluorescein angiography.

1.3. Genotypic – Phenotypic Features of Retinitis Pigmentosa

The disease progression rate and the age of symptom onset [10] vary according to many factors, including the pattern of genetic transmission. Today, it is known that a wide range of retinitis pigmentosa forms is caused by about 60 genes (Table 1), the most of them involved in phototransduction, canonical retinoid cycle in rods (twilight vision) and cones (daylight vision), inactivation, recovery and regulation of phototransduction cascade, cargo trafficking to the periciliary membrane and signal transduction [11]. A special mention goes to oxidative stress which, as for other hereditary pathologies [12], could determine the onset of retinitis pigmentosa [13].

Table 1. Different known forms of retinitis pigmentosa and related causative genes.
1 Autosomal Recessive
Autosomal Dominant
RP1 8q11–q13
2 Autosomal Recessive RP2 Xp11.23
4 Autosomal Recessive
Autosomal Dominant
RHO 3q21-q24
7 Autosomal Dominant ROM1, PRPH2 11q13, 6p21.1-cen
9 Autosomal Dominant RP9 7p14.2
10 Autosomal Dominant IMPDH1 7q31.3-q32
11 Autosomal Dominant PRPF31 19q13.4
12 Autosomal Recessive CRB1 1q31-q32.1
13 Autosomal Dominant PRPF8 17p13.3
14 Autosomal Recessive TULP1 6p21.3
15 X - Linked RPGR Xp11.4
17 Autosomal Dominant CA4 17q23
18 Autosomal Dominant PRPF3 1q21.2
19 Autosomal Recessive ABCA4 1p22.1
20 Autosomal Recessive RPE65 1p31
25 Autosomal Recessive EYS 6q12
26 Autosomal Recessive CERKL 2q31.2-q32.3
27 Autosomal Dominant NRL 14q11.1-q11.2
28 Autosomal Recessive FAM161A 2p15
30 Autosomal Dominant FSCN2 17q25
31 Autosomal Dominant TOPORS 9p21
33 Autosomal Dominant SNRNP200 2q11.2
35 Autosomal Recessive
Autosomal Dominant
SEMA4A 1q22
36 Autosomal Recessive PRCD 17q22
37 Autosomal Recessive
Autosomal Dominant
NR2E3 15q23
38 Autosomal Recessive MERTK 2q14.1
39 Autosomal Recessive USH2A 1q41
40 Autosomal Recessive PDE6B 4p16.3
41 Autosomal Recessive PROM1 4p15.3
42 Autosomal Dominant KLHL7 7p15.3
43 Autosomal Recessive PDE6A 5q31.2-q34
44 Autosomal Dominant RGR 10q23
45 Autosomal Recessive CNGB1 16q13
46 Autosomal Recessive IDH3B 20p13
47 Autosomal Recessive SAG 2q37.1
48 Autosomal Dominant GUCA1B 6p21.1
50 Autosomal Dominant BEST1 11q13
51 Autosomal Recessive TTC8 14q32.1
54 Autosomal Recessive C2orf71 2p24.1-p23.1
56 Autosomal Recessive IMPG2 3q11.2
58 Autosomal Recessive ZNF513 2p24.1-p22.3
59 Autosomal Recessive DHDDS 1p36.11
60 Autosomal Dominant PRPF6 20q13.33
62 Autosomal Recessive MAK 6q22
64 Autosomal Recessive C8orf37 8922.1
Bothnia Retinal Distrophy Autosomal Recessive RLBP1 15q26
Juvenile Retinitis Pigmentosa, AIPL1-Related Autosomal Recessive AIPL1 17p13.2
Leber congenital amaurosis 3 Autosomal Recessive SPATA7 14q31.3
Leber congenital amaurosis 13 Autosomal Recessive RDH12 14q23.3

Mutations of these genes may be autosomal recessive (50-60%), dominant (30-40%) [14]; [15], X-linked (5-20%; the first gene linked to the RP phenotype was discovered twenty-six years ago on the X chromosome) [16] or sporadic (30%). Although these known genes cause the most of retinitis pigmentosa forms, there are many other ones that are still unidentified nowadays [11, 17-27], and several regulative aspects have to be discovered [28]. This scenario suggests that new genes could contribute to the genesis of pathology, and should be investigated in order to improve treatment for this disabling disease. Our approach is based on an in-silico analysis.


The research was carried out looking for causative genes of eye – related pathologies in the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. The following keywords were employed: retinitis pigmentosa, eye disease, cone - rode dystrophy, Leber's congenital amaurosis, in different combinations. Cross references were manually searched when needed. Due to space limits, not all references were quoted here; comprehensive reviews were quoted instead.

An in-silico analysis was, then, exploited to detect new genes related to retinitis pigmentosa, and it was performed in three different steps: I) identification of common pathways and genes involved in; II) collection of previously obtained genes; III) deep analysis of intersected genes and implication into etiopathogenesis of retinitis pigmentosa. In details:

  1. Identification of common pathways and genes involved in: in order to detect possible related functions and new related genes, an intersection of known causative genes and a research of common pathways were performed by Cytoscape software ( and the three different plugins GeneMANIA (, CytoKEGG ( and BinGO (
  2. Collection of previously obtained genes: genes were collected from Kegg pathway database (, setting “Homo Sapiens” as organism and “phototransduction”, “retinitis”, “apoptosis”, “rod”, and “vision” as keywords.
  3. Deep analysis of selected genes and implication into etiopathogenesis of retinitis pigmentosa: all candidate genes have been added to “Pathway Analysis” query research of Reactome Pathway Database (, BioGraph ( and STRING (, in order to establish relationship level between physiological and pathological functions, and between known causative genes. Finally, the job was completed with the help of Genecards Suite Plus, made of GeneAnalytics (, PathCards ( and VarElect (, which provided a categorized list of matched tissues, cells, diseases, pathways, compounds and Gene Ontology (GO) terms to enhance gene set interpretation.

Moreover, in order to analyze common nodes related to each cellular process considered, a research of related phenotypes was performed in Malacards Human Disease Database (


3.1. Cytoscape Analysis

Intersection of about 50 causative genes for retinitis pigmentosa by Cytoscape and its plugins gave us about 30 proximal correlated genes, from witch we extracted 5 ones that are involved into phototransduction pathway, specifically in dark adaptation phases, which result the most altered one in pathological retinitis phenotype [29] (Figs. 1-3).

3.2. Phototransduction and the G-Protein Cascade [30]

In order to understand at what level the filtered 5 genes could be involved in retinal function alterations, it is necessary to explain briefly the main phases of phototransduction. The transduction of light into a neural signal takes place in the outer segment of photoreceptors: in our study we underline what happens in rods, which are retinitis pigmentosa most involved cells. Rod outer segment shows a lipid bilayer membrane arranged as flattened “discs” (optical discs), which is strictly packed with the photopigment rhodopsin. Rhodopsin is a member of the superfamily of seven-helix, G-Protein–Coupled Receptor proteins (GPCRs). Differently from chemosensing GPCRs, rhodopsin presents its ligand, the light-absorbing “chromophore” retinaldehyde, prebound. The bound form, 11-cis retinal, acts as a strong antagonist, holding rhodopsin in its completely inactive state. Absorption of a photon of light isomerizes the chromophore to the the all-trans configuration, which rapidly triggers a conformational change in the protein, activating rhodopsin as an enzyme. The conformational change triggered by light causes rhodopsin absorption spectrum to shift into the UV, so that the pigment loses its visible color and is said to “bleach.” Long after the end of signaling, the Schiff-base bond that attaches the all-trans retinal is hydrolyzed, permitting the retinoid to dissociate from the apo-protein, opsin. In addition to rhodopsin (R), which is packed into the disc membrane at high density, three other classes of proteins cooperate into activation of the photoresponse: 1) an heterotrimeric G - protein (G), called transducin in rods, with a 1:10 stechiometry to rhodopsin; 2) the cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE), which hydrolyzes cyclic GMP (cGMP), the second cytoplasmic messenger, present at about 100 units per rhodopsin one; and (3) the Cyclic Nucleotide – Gated Channels (CNGCs) of the plasma membrane, which control the flow of electrical current into the outer segment. The first three steps involve proteins associated with the disc membrane (rhodopsin, which is integral, and the G-protein and PDE, which are connected by acyl groups), whereas the final two involve the cGMP, and its action at the plasma membrane (Fig. 4 summarize all five steps).

Fig. (1). Intersection pathways of 50 known causative genes of retinitis pigmentosa. This image shows the Cytoscape pathways analysis, supported by GeneMANIA plug-in, with nodes and edges reflecting relationships between query genes involved in retinitis pigmentosa etiopathogenesis. Edge colors: Co-expression (light purple), physical interaction (antique pink), genetic interaction (green), shared protein domains (golden yellow), pathway (light blue), predicted (orange) and common function (grey).

Fig. (2). Five genes extracted from the whole intersection of fifty causative ones, with the common feature of involvement in phototransduction. This figure shows the most relevant pathway common to five clustered genes, highlighting the importance of phototransduction function.

Fig. (3). BinGO particular of five genes in exam. Graph evidences the close relationship between them and physiological activities of vision ones (most of which included into fifty causatives of retinitis pigmentosa, in comparison with Fig. 3).

3.3. The Five Genes “Functional Cluster”: RCVRN, GNB1, GNGT1, GRK7 and ARRB1

RCVRN: this gene encodes a member of the recoverin family of neuronal calcium sensors, which contains three calcium-binding EF-hand domains. It may delay phototransduction cascade termination in the retina by blocking the phosphorylation of photo-activated rhodopsin [31, 32]. Recoverin may be the antigen responsible for cancer-associated retinopathy [33].

GNB1 and GNGT1: heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins), which transduce extracellular signals received by transmembrane receptors to effector proteins [34]. They are membrane bound GTPases that are linked to 7-TM receptors. Each G protein contains an α-, β- and γ-subunit and is bound to GDP in the “off” state. Ligand-receptor binding results in detachment of the G protein, switching it to an “on” state and permitting Gα activation of second messenger signalling cascades. Transducin is one of these proteins, found specifically in rod outer segments, where it mediates the activation of a cyclic GTP-specific guanosine monophosphate phosphodiesterase by rhodopsin [35]. GNB1 encodes a β subunit, while GNGT1 the gamma one [36, 37]. The α subunit is encoded by GNAT1 gene. The β and γ chains are required for the GTPase activity, for replacement of GDP by GTP, and for G protein-effector interaction (provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013).

GRK7: This gene encodes a member of the guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptor kinase subfamily of the Ser/Thr protein kinase family (GRK) [38]. It is a retina-specific kinase involved in the shutoff of the photoresponse and adaptation to changing light conditions via cone opsin phosphorylation, including rhodopsin (RHO) [39]. It is believed that the movements of intracytoplasmic loop of activated RHO are responsible for the activation of the GRK7, in a way similar to GRK1 [40] (Fig. 5)).

Fig. (4). Phototransduction steps. 1) activation of the receptor protein in rods, that is rhodopsin (1 photon → 1 rhodopsin); 2) the activated receptor protein stimulates the G-protein transducin, with GTP converted to GDP in the process (1 rhodopsin → 100 transducins); 3) in turn, activated transducin activates the effector protein phosphodiesterase, converting cGMP to GMP (1 transducin → 100 PDE/s); 4) Falling concentrations of cGMP cause the transduction channels to close, decreasing Na+ current (1 PDE → 1000 GMP/s).

Fig. (5). Molecular mechanisms of GRK1 activation. GRK1 is a membrane – associated enzyme that has low affinity for Rho. After photoactivation, due to conformational changes in the receptor, GRK1 forms a complex with Rho* by associating with the secondo and third cytoplasmic loops of the receptor. According to one model, GRK1 becomes activated, dissociates, and phosphorilates the C - terminal region of many Rho. According to a second model, GRK1 remains bound and phosphorilates the nearby C – termini of Rho and Rho* at Ser334, Ser338 or Ser343.

ARRB1: Members of arrestin/beta-arrestin protein family are thought to participate in agonist-mediated desensitization of G-protein-coupled receptors and cause specific dampening of cellular responses to stimuli such as hormones, neurotransmitters, or sensory signals [41]. Arrestin beta 1 is a cytosolic protein and acts as a cofactor in the beta-adrenergic receptor kinase (BARK) mediated desensitization of beta-adrenergic receptors. During homologous desensitization, beta-arrestins bind to the GPRK-phosphorylated receptor and sterically preclude its coupling to the cognate G – protein (Fig. 6); the binding appears to require additional receptor determinants exposed only in the active receptor conformation [42]. The beta-arrestins target many receptors for internalization by acting as endocytic adapters (CLASPs, clathrin-associated sorting proteins) and recruiting the GPRCs to the adapter protein 2 complex 2 (AP-2) in clathrin-coated pits (CCPs). However, the extent of beta-arrestin involvement appears to vary significantly depending on the receptor, agonist and cell type. Internalized arrestin-receptor complexes traffic to intracellular endosomes, where they remain uncoupled from G-proteins [43]. Beta-arrestins function as multivalent adapter proteins that can act as signaling scaffold for MAPK pathways, like several other proteins as CCM proteins [44, 45], in the so-called beta-arrestin signalosomes [46]. Moreover, they can be involved in IGF1-stimulated AKT1 signaling leading to increased protection from apoptosis, in activation of the p38 MAPK signaling pathway and in actin bundle formation, in F2RL1-mediated cytoskeletal rearrangement and chemotaxis, and in AGTR1-mediated stress fiber formation by acting together with GNAQ to activate RHOA [47].

3.4. Common Pathways and Possible Involvment in Retinitis Pigmentosa

3.4.1. Reactome Analysis

As highlighted by the pathway database Reactome, all five gene products cooperate during phototransductional activation (Fig. 7), expecially in the dark adaptation, as confirmed by KEGG (Fig. 8). In darkness, the G protein transducin (Gt) is attached to the disk membrane surface with a GDP bound to it and it is inactive. Photoactivated rhodopsin (R*) catalyzes the exchange of GTP (present in a higher concentration than GDP) for GDP bound to Gt. Upon GTP/GDP exchange, Gt is released from R* and the Gtα with GTP bound (GNAT1 GTP) dissociates from Gtβ-Gtγ subunits (GNB1:GNGT1). This mechanism was deciphered from bovine experiments [48]. R* proceeds to activate additional Gt molecules, making this reaction the first amplification step in the phototransduction cascade. A single activated rhodopsin molecule activates tens of Gt molecules. R* must be deactivated to terminate the single photon response, and it happens after R* binds a rhodopsin kinase family member (as GRK7), a serine/threonine protein kinase [49]. GRK is activated by R* whereupon it phosphorylates R* at multiple serine and threonine sites (six in total) on its C terminus. Increasing phosphorylation progressively reduces the rate at which R* can activate transducin, but complete deactivation occurs only after arrestin (ARRB1) binds to and sterically caps R* [50]. A substantial fraction of GRK is bound to recoverin (RCVRN) in darkness, when internal Ca2+ levels are high (Fig. 9).

Fig. (6). Arrestin molecular mechanism. First, it binds to the cytoplasmic tip of the phosphorilated receptor, occluding the binding site for the heterotrimeric G – protein, preventing its activation (desensitization). Second (not in figure), arrestin links the receptor to elements of the internalization complex, clathrin and its adaptor AP2, which promote receptor mediated endocytosis and subsequent transport to endosomes.

Fig. (7). Reactome diagram of metabolic pathway involving five analyzed genes. Figure represents biochemical pathways of five selected genes, from Reactome database. Legend is present on the right.

Fig. (8). KEGG scheme of phototransduction reactions during dark and light adaptation. The whole phototransduction reactions could be divided in two main phases, regarding dark and light adaptation, and involving selected genes. During phototransduction, photoreceptor cells convert light into electrical signals. The vertebrate cascade starts with the absorption of photons by the photoreceptive pigments, the rhodopsins, isomerizing 11-cis-retinal to all-trans-retinal and inducing a structural change that activates the opsin. Such biochemical reaction triggers hydrolysis of cGMP by activating a transducinphosphodiesterase 6 (PDE6) cascade, resulting in membrane cGMP-gated cation channels (CNG) closure. This event implies photoreceptor membrane hyperpolarization, modulating the release of neurotransmitters to downstream cells. Recovery from light involves photolyzed rhodopsin phosphorilation by rhodopsin kinase (RK) and subsequent capping off by arrestin. Finally, GTP-binding transducin alpha subunit is deactivated by RGS9.

RCVRN is an EF-hand protein [50] that functions as a myristoyl switch. With Ca2+ bound, the myristoyl group is exposed to attach RCVRN to the membrane. When Ca2+ levels drop with light exposure, Ca2+ dissociates from RCVRN and GRK is released. Higher levels of free GRK1 accelerate the phosphorylation and shutoff of photoexcited rhodopsin (R*). However, this feedback mechanism proceeds too slowly to impact the single photon response that was responsible for causing the fall in Ca2+. Instead, it operates during light adaptation, where the light-induced fall in Ca2+ primes the rod to release GRK1 to act after subsequent photoisomerizations of rhodopsin. RCVRN also serves as a Ca2+ buffer within the rod outer segment.

Fig. (9). Dark adaptation mediated by selected five genes. Phototransductional activation with dark adaptation is mediated by five clustered genes (adapted from Reactome). R* (here called MII) catalyzes GDP/GTP exchange (a), triggering GNAT1 – GTP complex, which binds and activates PDE6 (b). GRK (here GRK1) inhibition by recoverin promotes such activation (c).

3.4.2. BioGraph Analysis

Thanks to BioGraph web service, we could conjecture how these genes should be involved into etiopathogenesis of retinitis pigmentosa. All five analyzed genes share annotation or pathways with already known causative ones: in detail, they are TULP1 (required for normal photoreceptor function and for long-term survival of photoreceptor cells, interacts with cytoskeleton proteins and may play a role in protein transport of these cells), PROM1 (during early retinal development acts as a key regulator of disk morphogenesis; it is also involved in regulation of MAPK and Akt signaling pathways), RP1 (encoding a MAP needed for the correct stacking of disc in the outer segment of photoreceptor), RPGR (guanine-nucleotide releasing factor, which plays a role in ciliogenesis and in intraflagellar transport processes by regulating actin stress filaments and cell contractility), CNGA1 (the encoded protein can be activated by cyclic GMP which leads to an opening of the cation channel and thereby causing a depolarization of rod photoreceptors), GUCA1B (calcium-binding protein that activates photoreceptor guanylate cyclases; this Ca2+-sensitive regulation of GC is a key event in recovery of the dark state of rod photoreceptors following light exposure), PDE6A-B (these genes encode alfa and beta subunits of the phosphodiesterase 6 holoenzyme, which regulate the rod cGMP concentration, an important regulator of cell membrane current), and CNGB1 (subunit of cyclic nucleotide-gated channels, nonselective cation channels, involved in the regulation of ion flow into the rod photoreceptor outer segment (ROS) in response to light-induced alteration of cGMP intracellular levels). GNGT1 shares many targets of GNB1, but also shows a protein interaction with RHO and involvement in eye photoreceptor cell development and light signal transduction, annotating with RGR (putative retinal G-protein coupled receptor for all-trans- and 11-cis-retinal; it binds preferentially to the former and may catalyze the isomerization of the chromophore by a retinochrome-like mechanism). RCVRN stands for the calcium sensitive guanylate cyclase activator activity, requested for its fine molecular regulation. GRK7 evidenced a protein interaction with PDE6D (another subunity of the PDE complex, that also binds to prenyl groups of proteins to target them to subcellular organelles called cilia) and annotation with genes appointed to vision, FAM161A (involved in ciliogenesis) and SPATA7 (required for the stable assembly and localization of the ciliary RPGRIP1 protein complex in the connecting cilium). ARRB1, instead, shows a fundamental protein interaction with SAG (member of arrestin/beta-arrestin protein family, is a major soluble photoreceptor protein that is involved in desensitization of the photoactivated transduction cascade) and DPY30, component of a multiprotein histone methyltransferase complex, which regulates the causative PRPF3 gene (participates in pre-mRNA splicing). Summarizing, the five clustered genes are mainly involved in phototransduction, eye photoreceptor cell development and calcium sensitive guanylate cyclase activator activity pathways, medianting interactions with light signal transduction key proteins. Alterations in these processes could lead to retinitis pigmentosa (Fig. 10).

Fig. (10). BioGraph adapted branched schemes of relationship between five clustered gene and their connection with retinitis pigmentosa. This graph represents the connection between GNB1 (a), GNGT1 (b), RCVRN (c), GRK7 (d) and ARRB1 (e) and retinitis pigmentosa (in form of gene, localization and shared functions).

3.4.3. STRING Analysis

All these cooperative genes are also related on String phototransductional pathway graphical scheme (Fig. 11), which highlights how they give rise to “functional clusters”, units that support the same biological activity. The five analyzed genes result are mainly involved in G – protein signaling modulation, as evidenced by interaction with G – protein subunits and signaling regulators families, together with phosphoducin – like protein (PDCL), G – protein signaling modulator 1 (GPSM1) and adrenoceptor beta 2 (ADRB2). Moreover, the connection between the considered five gene cluster and cyclic nucleotide gated channel family seems to be very interesting, as proven by interactions with cyclic nucleotide gated channel family proteins. It is evident that all considered genes, directly or not, share the final target RHO, which presents the highest frequency of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa known mutations found until today (Fig. 12).

Fig. (11). STRING connection pathway. It results evident how close is the interactions between five genes in exam and rhodopsin one. Colored points and lines represent interaction types: green for “activation”, blue for “binding”, light blue for “phenotype”, black for “reaction”, red for “inhibition”, dark purple for “catalysis”, light purple for “post-translational modification”, yellow for “transcriptional regulation”.

Fig. (12). Pie chart frequencies of main autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa mutations in causative genes. The highest frequency of retinitis pigmentosa causative mutation is distributed in still unknown genes, while RHO results at first place of known causative genes, with about 28% of frequency representation.

3.4.4. GeneAnalytics and VarElect Analyses

To further substantiate the possible relation between examined genes and retinitis pigmentosa, we used the Genecards Plus Suite, made of several modules. The Gene Analytics gave us positive scores about tissue (eye = 0.83) and cells (retinal cells = 1.35 and mature rod cells = 0.91) where their encoded proteins are expressed. Based on the function, other useful scores came from gene ontology biological processes (phototransduction = 25.14, regulation of rhodopsin mediated signal pathway = 24.71, signal transduction = 19.41) and from superpathways filtered by Reactome itself, Qiagen, GeneGo, BioSystems, KEGG and PharmGKB (the phototransduction cascade = 43.08 and diseases associated with visual transduction = 19.97). The last evidence from Gene Analytics regards compounds or small molecules related to query gene set, in order to deliver possible therapeutic approaches against certain pathology: in our case, farnesyl (19.03), guanosine monophosphate (10.33), guanosine diphosphate (9.60) and metarhodopsin II (9.44) have the best scores. The other main module of the suite is VarElect, which associates a phenotype to a list of candidate genes. The five query genes were correlated with retinitis pigmentosa phenotype, and results were encouraging: three of them (GNB1, GNGT1 and RCVRN) were already objects of study in query disease researches, while the other two (GRK7 and ARRB1) have never been associated until now.


In this work, we tried to relate a “functional cluster” made of five genes (GNB1, GNGT1, GRK7, RCVRN and ARRB1) with retinitis pigmentosa pathology. We chose this group of genes due to their correlation with dark light adaptation, the most severe consequence of query disease. Pathway analysis, with the help of many qualified online databases, permitted us to hypothesize their possible role into etiopathogenesis of retinitis pigmentosa, also considering the key activity of their encoded proteins (rhodopsin kinase and transducin with own inhibitors). Next step will be validating our hypothesis with functional assays to ensure the real meaning of this possible association, with the final purpose of discovering new retinitis pigmentosa causative genes. Such proposal will be very useful to develop new personalized diagnostic approaches, followed by new therapeutic ones.


Not applicable.


No animals/humans were used for studies that are the basis of this research.


Not applicable.


The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.


Declared none.


[1] Zobor D, Zrenner E. Retinitis pigmentosa - A review. Pathogenesis, guidelines for diagnostics and perspectives. Ophthalmologe 2012; 109(5): 501-14.
[2] Veltel S, Wittinghofer A. RPGR and RP2: Targets for the treatment of X-linked retinitis pigmentosa? Expert Opin Ther Targets 2009; 13(10): 1239-51.
[3] D’Angelo R, Alafaci C, Scimone C, et al. Sporadic cerebral cavernous malformations: Report of further mutations of CCM genes in 40 Italian patients. BioMed Res Int 2013; 2013: 459253.
[4] D’Angelo R, Scimone C, Calabrò M, Schettino C, Fratta M, Sidoti A. Identification of a novel CCM2 gene mutation in an Italian family with multiple cerebral cavernous malformations and epilepsy: A causative mutation? Gene 2013; 519(1): 202-7.
[5] Daniele S, Restagno G, Daniele C, Nardacchione A, Danese P, Carbonara A. Analysis of the rhodopsin and peripherin/RDS gene in two families with pattern dystrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium. Eur J Ophthalmol 1996; 6(2): 197-200.
[6] Murakami Y, Notomi S, Hisatomi T, et al. Photoreceptor cell death and rescue in retinal detachment and degenerations. Prog Retin Eye Res 2013; 37: 114-40.
[7] Mazzoni F, Safa H, Finnemann SC. Understanding photoreceptor outer segment phagocytosis: Use and utility of RPE cells in culture. Exp Eye Res 2014; 126: 51-60.
[8] Daiger SP, Sullivan LS, Bowne SJ. Genes and mutations causing retinitis pigmentosa. Clin Genet 2013; 84(2): 132-41.
[9] Bonnet C, El-Amraoui A. Usher syndrome (sensorineural deafness and retinitis pigmentosa): Pathogenesis, molecular diagnosis and therapeutic approaches. Curr Opin Neurol 2012; 25(1): 42-9.
[10] Newman AM, Gallo NB, Hancox LS, et al. Systems-level analysis of age-related macular degeneration reveals global biomarkers and phenotype-specific functional networks. Genome Med 2012; 4(2): 16.
[11] Daiger SP, Bowne SJ, Sullivan LS. Genes and mutations causing autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2014; 5(10): a017129.
[12] Rinaldi C, Bramanti P, Famà A, et al. Glyoxalase I A111e, paraoxonase 1 Q192r and L55m polymorphisms in italian patients with sporadic cerebral cavernous malformations: A pilot study. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2015; 29(2): 493-500.
[13] Kruk J, Kubasik-Kladna K, Aboul-Enein HY. The role oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of eye diseases: Current status and a dual role of physical activity. Mini Rev Med Chem 2015; 16(3): 241-57.
[14] Sebastio L, Festa LVB, Valliani R, et al. Retinite pigmentosa e ritardo mentale in due fratelli: Sindrome X-linked da probabile microdelezione 1992.
[15] G. Restagno AN, P. Danese, A. Fea, F.M. Grignolo, A. Carbonara. Eterogeneita' genetica e clinica nelle forme autosomiche dominanti di retinite pigmentosa. X Cong Naz FISME; Spoleto1995.
[16] Restagno G, Ferrone PDM, Garnerone S, et al. Caratterizzazione di mutazioni in pazienti affetti da retinite pigmentosa autosomica dominante. VIII Cong Naz FISME Sorrento. 1993.1993.
[17] Wang XT, Mion B, Aherne A, Engel PC. Molecular recruitment as a basis for negative dominant inheritance? propagation of misfolding in oligomers of IMPDH1, the mutated enzyme in the RP10 form of retinitis pigmentosa. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011; 1812(11): 1472-6.
[18] Greenwald DL, Cashman SM, Kumar-Singh R. Mutation-independent rescue of a novel mouse model of Retinitis Pigmentosa. Gene Ther 2013; 20(4): 425-34.
[19] Sarao V, Veritti D, Prosperi R, Pignatto S, Lanzetta P. A case of CRB1-negative Coats-like retinitis pigmentosa. J AAPOS 2013; 17(4): 414-6.
[20] Hipp S, Zobor G, Glockle N, Mohr J, Kohl S, Zrenner E, et al. Phenotype variations of retinal dystrophies caused by mutations in the RLBP1 gene. Acta Ophthalmologica 2015; 93(4): 281-6.
[21] Lazar CH, Mutsuddi M, Kimchi A, et al. Whole exome sequencing reveals GUCY2D as a major gene associated with cone and cone-rod dystrophy in Israel. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014; 56(1): 420-30.
[22] Pierrottet CO, Zuntini M, Digiuni M, et al. Syndromic and non-syndromic forms of retinitis pigmentosa: A comprehensive Italian clinical and molecular study reveals new mutations. Genet Mol Res 2014; 13(4): 8815-33.
[23] Shevach E, Ali M, Mizrahi-Meissonnier L, et al. Association between missense mutations in the BBS2 gene and nonsyndromic retinitis pigmentosa. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015; 133(3): 312-8.
[24] van Huet RA, Siemiatkowska AM, Ozgul RK, et al. Retinitis pigmentosa caused by mutations in the ciliary MAK gene is relatively mild and is not associated with apparent extra-ocular features. Acta ophthalmologica 2015; 93(1): 83-94.
[25] Shen T, Guan L, Li S, et al. Mutation analysis of Leber congenital amaurosis-associated genes in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Mol Med Rep 2015; 11(3): 1827-32.
[26] Wang F, Li H, Xu M, et al. A homozygous missense mutation in NEUROD1 is associated with nonsyndromic autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014; 56(1): 150-5.
[27] Zhao L, Wang F, Wang H, et al. Next-generation sequencing-based molecular diagnosis of 82 retinitis pigmentosa probands from Northern Ireland. Hum Genet 2015; 134(2): 217-30.
[28] Donato L, Bramanti P, Scimone C, Rinaldi C, D'Angelo R, Sidoti A. miRNAexpression profile of Retinal Pigment Epithelial (RPE) cells under oxidative stress conditions. FEBS Open Bio 2018; 8(2): 219-33.
[29] Wang B, Shen C, Zhang L, et al. Dark adaptation-induced changes in rod, cone and intrinsically photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cell (ipRGC) sensitivity differentially affect the Pupil Light Response (PLR). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 253(11): 1997-2005.
[30] Lamb TD, Pugh EN Jr. Phototransduction, dark adaptation, and rhodopsin regeneration the proctor lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47(12): 5137-52.
[31] Strissel KJ, Lishko PV, Trieu LH, Kennedy MJ, Hurley JB, Arshavsky VY. Recoverin undergoes light-dependent intracellular translocation in rod photoreceptors. J Biol Chem 2005; 280(32): 29250-5.
[32] Maeda T, Imanishi Y, Palczewski K. Rhodopsin phosphorylation: 30 years later. Prog Retin Eye Res 2003; 22(4): 417-34.
[33] Bazhin AV, Schadendorf D, Philippov PP, Eichmüller SB. Recoverin as a cancer-retina antigen. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2007; 56(1): 110-6.
[34] Mylvaganam GH, McGee TL, Berson EL, Dryja TP. A screen for mutations in the transducin gene GNB1 in patients with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Mol Vis 2006; 12: 1496-8.
[35] Clack JW, Juhl M, Rice CA, Li J, Witzmann FA. Proteomic analysis of transducin beta-subunit structural heterogeneity. Electrophoresis 2003; 24(19-20): 3493-9.
[36] Hurley JB, Stryer L. Purification and characterization of the gamma regulatory subunit of the cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase from retinal rod outer segments. J Biol Chem 1982; 257(18): 11094-9.
[37] Scherer SW, Feinstein DS, Oliveira L, Tsui LC, Pittler SJ. Gene structure and chromosome localization to 7q21.3 of the human rod photoreceptor transducin gamma-subunit gene (GNGT1). Genomics 1996; 35(1): 241-3.
[38] Chen CK, Zhang K, Church-Kopish J, et al. Characterization of human GRK7 as a potential cone opsin kinase. Mol Vis 2001; 7: 305-13.
[39] Osawa S, Weiss ER. A tale of two kinases in rods and cones. Adv Exp Med Biol 2012; 723: 821-7.
[40] Horner TJ, Osawa S, Schaller MD, Weiss ER. Phosphorylation of GRK1 and GRK7 by cAMP-dependent protein kinase attenuates their enzymatic activities. J Biol Chem 2005; 280(31): 28241-50.
[41] Wang P, Xu TY, Wei K, et al. ARRB1/β-arrestin-1 mediates neuroprotection through coordination of BECN1-dependent autophagy in cerebral ischemia. Autophagy 2014; 10(9): 1535-48.
[42] Zhang YX, Li XF, Yuan GQ, et al. β-Arrestin 1 has an essential role in neurokinin-1 receptor-mediated glioblastoma cell proliferation and G2/M phase transition. J Biol Chem 2017; 292(21): 8933-47.
[43] Bhattacharyya S, Hope TJ, Young JA. Differential requirements for clathrin endocytic pathway components in cellular entry by Ebola and Marburg glycoprotein pseudovirions. Virology 2011; 419(1): 1-9.
[44] Scimone C, Bramanti P, Alafaci C, et al. Update on Novel CCM gene mutations in patients with cerebral cavernous malformations. J Mol Neurosci 2017; 61(2): 189-98.
[45] Scimone C, Bramanti P, Ruggeri A, et al. Detection of novel mutation in ccm3 causes familial cerebral cavernous malformations. J Mol Neurosci 2015; 57(3): 400-3.
[46] McLaughlin NJ, Banerjee A, Kelher MR, et al. Platelet-activating factor-induced clathrin-mediated endocytosis requires beta-arrestin-1 recruitment and activation of the p38 MAPK signalosome at the plasma membrane for actin bundle formation. J Immunol 2006; 176(11): 7039-50.
[47] Barnes WG, Reiter E, Violin JD, Ren XR, Milligan G, Lefkowitz RJ. beta-Arrestin 1 and Galphaq/11 coordinately activate RhoA and stress fiber formation following receptor stimulation. J Biol Chem 2005; 280(9): 8041-50.
[48] Pugh EN Jr, Lamb TD. Amplification and kinetics of the activation steps in phototransduction. Biochim Biophys Acta 1993; 1141(2-3): 111-49.
[49] Weiss ER, Ducceschi MH, Horner TJ, Li A, Craft CM, Osawa S. Species-specific differences in expression of G-protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) 7 and GRK1 in mammalian cone photoreceptor cells: Implications for cone cell phototransduction. J Neurosci 2001; 21(23): 9175-84.
[50] Burns ME, Pugh EN Jr. Lessons from photoreceptors: Turning off g-protein signaling in living cells. Physiology (Bethesda) 2010; 25(2): 72-84.